The Asus Open, Championship Gaming Series (CGS) and Electronic Sports World Cup (ESWC) all have one thing in common – Call of Duty 4 (CoD4). Despite the fact that Counter Strike 1.6 and 'Source both have more players, I say this through bitten lips, all three organisations have made an attempt to use the game in some capacity.
The CGS held a £10,000 tournament at the European qualifier and draft two months ago, the ESWC held a tournament at the Masters event a fortnight ago and the game will be present at the grand finals in San Jose (USA), next month. They unlike the Asus Open have remained cryptic about the game, the Russians freely admit that Quake III was dropped in favour of CoD4 and joins Starcraft and Warcraft III as a 'second-tier game'.
In a 2007 interview with Michal 'Carmac' Blichaz, Matthieu Dallon (CEO of Games Services), commented that CoD4 was difficult to add [to ESWC] because of the “impact on logistics and costs” and that they'd chosen to “develop CS Women instead of a new team-played title”. While the tournament was run under the guise of the 'Packard Bell iPOWER Games 2008', it was Games Services who were responsible for running the tournament won ultimately by the French H2k.Thermaltake.
The iPOWER Games and CGS were heavily flawed because of a lack of coverage, the forthcoming Asus Open is likely to be equally unsuccessful because of a poor prize purse. Only the CGS tournament can claim to be a significant 'experiment' and their tournament rightfully attracted a number of foreign teams to the event in Birmingham (UK).
The event which was won by won by the Swedes of fnatic, still maintains the record as the highest prize purse ever given out in Call of Duty 4. The event itself proved poor value for money though, Crossfire's Stuart 'TosspoT' Saw said that the event cost the CGS £133 per-person, “because I assure you that come the summer nobody outside of those that were there will remember the event”.
This record will be broken tomorrow and in spectacular fashion, the Antwerp eSports Festival (AEF) begins with two tournament pre-favourites, Dignitas and H2k.Thermaltake, playing in the early morning matches at 8.25am. The event itself with be overshadowed only days later by the-eXperience (TEX) who will offer a marginal prize increase over AEF's €30,000.
While hardened 1.6' and Source' players may shrug at such insignificant figures, CoD as a franchise has grown from from hosting €3,000 to €30,000 tournaments in the space of a year. These are community driven events which will never leave the franchise, I often think that the average CoD player has lost track of how rapidly the game is moving and while we may not have the likes of the World Cyber Games and ESWC, yet, the number of people playing both versions of Counter Strike (CS) decreases while CoD continues to grow.
In a straight fight of numbers CS gives CoD a black-eye, we do however have a lot going for us and while that maybe hard to realise as we glance towards the man in the urinal next to us, whose naturally or should that be unnaturally well-endowed? The likes of AEF and “Easybash” listen fervently to the community in a way the ESWC was once famous for. We don't a TV mod, yet, but Mike 'Garetjax' Berkowitz's timely return to competitive CoD complements Ryan 'raf1' Palmer's promod perfectly.
You've to wonder whether it's fate or luck that Gamegune 'clashes' with AEF this weekend, on the one hand you've a distinctly ordinary CS tournament and on the other the most competitive CoD LAN ever, both have similar prize pots and if I were a tournament organiser I know which scenario I would be wanting.
I can feel the momentum building and to all the professional CoD4 players out there, you're a lot closer to earning a wage than you were in vanilla CoD, just remember that.
News
The unwinnable war against CS

Counter Strike's stranglehold over traditional eSport competition means Call of Duty is unlikely to ever replace the game in a straight fight.
Loading comments...
More columns
With SRS now down to just two solo players, The Zechs Files wonders if we'll see more gamers playing with themselves and asks the question, is the team league finished?
In a change from the scheduled WoW column, I decided to do something a little more topical. The title sums it up pretty well.
This year's World Cyber Games would have been remembered as a tournament of mishaps and scandals. But then, the passion of true gamers saved the day.
Thanks to losing to eSTRO in the group stage Meet Your Makers will not meet highly-rated opponents until the semi final.
With halloween behind us, and Wrath just ahead, The Zechs Files invites you to gaze deep into the crystal ball, as we try to predict the fate of one of the game's most powerful set-ups.
The world is in crisis. With the markets in turmoil, who better to call than some nerd who writes a column for a gaming website? This week's Zechs Files investigates the impact of the Credit Crunch on gamers.
















I still remember how the first Battlefield-demo drew thousands of Scandinavian CS-players off the CS-servers and into the arms of DICE. They hung on to the game, but horrible support for the game, flawed netcode, no BFTV and a lack of easy brandable game-modes killed it.
Call of Duty had the same couple of problems. The game still holds quite a high place in my games-collection, but it was simply not suited to take over for CS. Now, in the 4th sequel, they are pretty damn near. And the game will have a pretty nice community by the time the 5th and 6th game comes out - and then it will be over.
New game, new community, new places to spend money for Activision and IW. No more money for CoD4 and then you can start all over again, trying to get the game adjusted to professional play.
edit: but I do agree, thats a big problem and a reason why bf nor cod will ever be able to take on any cs title
But had BF42 not had a successor pushed up its arse, then Desert Combat might have managed to take over quite a big part of the European market.
eSports can't sustain many games so despite the fact there have been games good enough, CS 1.6 has stayed because of 'bad' economics. -teeMu- pretty much summed it up, CoD can't replace CS because it doesn't have as many players, the fact is might be a better or worse game doesn't even come into it.
CoD has sustained itself and grown naturally unlike a lot of games, it will get there eventually.
But I agree that gameplay is not the only thing about it ofc.
WHAT?
U gotta be joking evan, i reckon your right most of the time but here, you sir are most definately wrong. I know you are the SK CoD guy but your nuts if you don't accept that CS has winning gameplay, and of course that gameplay is a major reason why it has lasted. Yeh i agree with you saying e-sports can't sustain many games and also yeh "winning gameplay" is only my opinion, but its also the opinion of a million other people.
peace
To fight the unbeatable foe
To bear with unbearable sorrow
To run where the brave dare not gooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
To love pure and chaste from afar
To try when your arms are too weary
To reach the unreachable starrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
But i heared from some cod4 players, including me, that they won't take a look on CoD5 and will stay on CoD4 (like cs 1.6 and css).
So let's hope the communitiy will stay on cod4!
COD4 is great as an additional discipline but nothing more.
I'm seriously tired of seeing article after article debating the nuances of eSports rather than actually covering eSports itself. ASUS just picked up CoD4 for their event, the best CoD4 player in the world was added to the eSports awards, and as mentioned, AEF is this weekend and the eXperience is shortly after. Focus on actually covering the sport instead of debating tirelessly over inane topics such as this. There's going to be so many great games, so many great storylines, a preview in any form would be a hundred times more insightful, entertaining, and just plain useful.
Very nice read, evan!
"debating the nuances of eSports" seems a very weird way of wording it. I was merely pointing out that CoD4 can't compete with CS so they've to sustain themselves with their own tournaments like the AEF and Easybash, which naturally lead to the coverage I had planned (see below).
http://www.sk-gaming.com/content/17911-Antwerp_eSports_Festival
What do these have that COD1/2 and 4 do not have?
A large 'visible' community.
That is what will make or break a game, not what people behind the scenes do.
cod will never grove to a level like CS becouse it is not about the gameplay but about the graphics
There isn't much but some games are just perfect to watch and play, don't get me wrong I love cod4, play it on a high level and I would love to see it go even higher but you just cant see such tactics and creativity that CS has to offer, in any game.
CoD4 isn't here to conquer 1.6's spot, it shouldnt even try to do that. We can easily live side by side and still get great tournaments etc. CoD4 is an amazing game and deserves to have more scene and tournaments, but it just can't be compared to CS 1.6.
find real better game to replace it not easy throught
This is two different games, with different gameplays! it's not about CoD replace CS (this is stupid).
we can play cs AND cod AND q3 , it doesn't really matters!
When counter-strike was released , it was like wow atm, a lot of people were playing cs on cyber...it created a large community, and big teams. So people started to compete on local lans, then national, and then international! Some players started to earn some money etc. , until now!
You find CS everywhere, evrybody knows CS. CoD did not make this success, that's all, and it will never be as played as CS...or as competitive as CS! it's like Football and golf, you can't compare them!